The Beijing News

Appear in a policy of the current property market regulation effects a sensitive time, arranged a special capital subsidies talent buyers, there is clearly a "de facto bailout" suspicion and lack of policy and legal point of view of rationality. Positive control of the property market in a period of policy effects reveal sensitive, economic development zone, Hangzhou implementation this paper instrument, it is normal "talent encourages move" or "de facto policy of savingThe market "? Market regulation policy there is no adjustment signs, large and medium-sized property companies prepared to "winter", prices continued to fall in market is expected to have been formed. In this situation, the $ 100 million to shoulder the heavy task of reversing the downturn in the property market as a whole atmosphere. However, you cannot change the market's expectations, it doesn't mean you can't change policy expected. Hangzhou economic development zone, the introduction of thisMeasures, no matter what name, but objectively speaking has shown distinct from the property market regulation policy trend. One of the most closely watched a clause--"housing applicants must in 2011, in the context of development zone of commercial housing purchased" even more suspicion: Why worry? Even this tendency is indeed for talent encouragement in their minds swtor credits, but we had a macro-policy andDomain policies are not well-coordinated, and out of step. This is not in tune, for control policy is in itself a hedge, a discount. More important is, put up the money for subsidizing housing of specific groups, also suffered on fair interrogation. This $ 100 million fund from where? After review and approval of the relevant procedures? Subsidized with public money is not disadvantaged for specific groupsAnd the apparent lack of rationality. If the authorization and disbursement of funds used nor transparent, then it lacks legitimacy. May be unfair, but also in other areas. If development zone can implement policies similar to the rescue, so why not apply the same policy in other districts? Regulatory policies should be implemented because of regional features are being seriously, force differ�� Managers in the Government, it must be recognized by the "no provision impracticable". If these policy grey area is not clearly defined, then we cannot say, Fund subsidized housing is illegal. Since recently, some cities to target specific groups, implementation in a specific area policies such as subsidies and settled in the award of the purchase, are common. Shenzhen 2009Year introduced subsidies, fellows will receive $ 2 million to a maximum, a one-time payment of $ 600,000 a month after a further 23,000, are higher than most people's wages. This type of policy, of course, highlight the talents of highly recognized social values, but it has caused a number of policy concerns and by reason of doubt. Even if those policies did not have the intention to rescue in disguise swtor power leveling, but still need institutional frameworksConstraint. Otherwise, it could become law in macro-control policies outside the zone. In fact, for a talented, really encouraging and favorable environment, is not authorized by the lack of transparency in monetary subsidies, and, on the contrary, is that they can feel perfect and transparent system. This is the talent market real prerequisite for prosperity. Property market regulation, too. (The Beijing News)Gold-line statement: Gold-line reproduced above, does not indicate that confirm the description for investor use only and does not constitute investment advice. Investor actions accordingly, and at your own risk.